Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization

Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (No. 651) 101 F.2d 774, modified and affirmed.
Syllabus	Opinion [ Roberts ]	Separate [ Stone ]	Concurrence [ Hughes ]	Dissent [ Mcreynolds ]
HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version

HUGHES, C.J., Concurring Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

307 U.S. 496

Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 651 Argued: February 27, 28, 1939 --- Decided: June 5, 1939

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HUGHES, concurring:

With respect to the merits I agree with the opinion of MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS and in the affirmance of the judgment as modified. With respect to the point as to jurisdiction I agree with what is said in the opinion of MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS as to the right to discuss the National Labor Relations Act being a privilege of a citizen of the United States, but I am not satisfied that the record adequately supports the resting of jurisdiction upon that ground. As to that matter, I concur in the opinion of MR. JUSTICE STONE.